On 16 April 1975, Margaret Thatcher said this to the Conservative Group for Europe:
“It is a myth that our membership of the Community will suffocate national tradition and culture.”
By 26 August 1997, however, The Daily Mail was saying this:
“The European Union has a map showing Britain divided into areas such as the European Region of Scotland with ENGLAND NO LONGER SO-CALLED, but divided into four 'European regions'."
On 15 April 1999, The Sun added:
“The EU has mapped out its dream of the future - a Europe without England. A chart sent to businesses, schools and libraries shows Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland as parts of Europe. But cheeky Eurocrats, hell-bent on a federal superstate, HAVE NOT MARKED ENGLAND. Instead it is simply represented by nine regions.”
On 13 November 2001, The Wirral Globe, no less, chipped in patriotically:
“THE ENGLISH NO LONGER EXIST, according to the European Commission's publication of maps of the United Kingdom.
They show Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland, BUT NOT ENGLAND AS AN ENTITY OR COUNTRY. Instead, it shows where England used to be - from Northumbria to Cornwall as nine different 'regions of the European Union'.
ENGLAND AND THE ENGLISH HAVE BEEN ETHNICALLY, RACIALLY AND NATIONALLY CLEANSED WITHOUT A SINGLE SHOT BEING FIRED.”
http://archive.wirralglobe.co.uk/2001/11/13/7224.html
The EU denied these accusations thus:
"The regions used by the European Union for Statistics for maps ARE CHOSEN BY MEMBER STATES. In the case of the UK, the EU uses the regional division CHOSEN BY THE UK GOVERNMENT…
The regions of England are referred to as Economic Planning Regions as PREVIOUSLY DESIGNATED BY THE UK GOVERNMENT. If England was designated as a separate regional entity (as Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland are) BY THE UK GOVERNMENT, then it would have been mentioned on the map. The internal administrative boundaries of a Member State IS A MATTER FOR EACH MEMBER STATE to determine.”
http://ec.europa.eu/unitedkingdom/press/euromyths/myth49_en.htm
Which denial says just one thing to me: our own treacherous politicians are as happy as the EU Eurocrats to have old England gone.
The Liberation Magazine tells us this:
“The abolition of The United Kingdom by the European Union is… set for May 2009.In 1998, a court case prosecuting Tony Blair, the Queen and 3 former Prime Ministers, under the Treason Acts, was coming to a conclusion. The charge was that as they had illegally signed 4 treaties abolishing our nation, they were guilty of treason and faced life imprisonment.
Shortly before the final hearing, the laws of treason were repealed under the Crime and Disorder Act section 36.3 and the case was dismissed. In 2002 the Queen signed a fifth treaty. The sixth and final one, meaning the abolition of Britain, is scheduled for May 2009. This final treaty will adopt the EU Constitution.”
http://www.liberation-mag.org.uk/outofeu.html
So, according all of the above, the abolition of Britain is almost complete and England doesn’t exist.
Well, I do seem to recall hearing that 80% of our laws now originate in Brussels, so we know that the nameless, faceless folk have a lot more power over us than they ought to have, but abolition? I guess we’re just going to have to wait until May to see if the good ship Britannia sails off the edge of the world on schedule.
As for England, I don't remember hearing that our green and pleasant land had been done away with? We all know they don't like us writing "English" on government forms and the government jobsworth uses the word "England" as little as possible these days but have “England and the English”, as The Wirral Globe claims, really “been ethnically, racially and nationally cleansed without a single shot being fired”?
Surely not!
This is what the Encyclopaedia Britannica tells us:
“Despite the political, economic, and cultural legacy that has secured the perpetuation of its name, ENGLAND NO LONGER OFFICIALLY EXISTS AS A COUNTRY. Unlike Scotland and Wales, which have their own departments of state and Cabinet ministers, and Northern Ireland, which has self-government in domestic affairs, ENGLAND ENJOYS NO SEPARATE POLITICAL STATUS WITHIN THE UNITED KINGDOM.”
http://www.uv.es/EBRIT/macro/macro_5006_45_245.html
“CONSTITUTIONALLY, ENGLAND DOES NOT EXIST. It is not mentioned in the title of the sovereign who rules the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and of Her other Realms and Territories. Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland have certain governmental institutions of their own, but ENGLAND, HAVING SUBSUMED OR CREATED THOSE INSTITUTIONS AT ONE TIME OR ANOTHER, NEEDS NO SPECIAL MENTION”.
http://www.uv.es/EBRIT/micro/micro_192_73.html
Pop down to your local library and look up “England” in the aforementioned tome, ladies and gentlemen.
You’ll soon see that, as the man says, “you couldn’t make it up”.
Check out, “Do you know the Truth About the EU?”, here:
http://www.eutruth.org.uk/
7.4.09
A Teaboy in St Pauls
On April Fool's Day 2009, The Daily Mail reported thus:
"Gordon Brown has made an overtly religious call for a NEW WORLD ORDER based on the 'deep moral sense' shared by all faiths. Making the first speech by a serving Prime Minister at St Paul's Cathedral in London, he quoted scripture as he urged people to unite to forge a new 'GLOBAL SOCIETY'.
The Prime Minister argued that through all faiths, traditions and heritages runs a 'single powerful modern sense demanding RESPONSIBILITY FROM ALL AND FAIRNESS TO ALL'.
He quoted the Christian doctrine of 'DO TO OTHERS WHAT YOU WOULD HAVE THEM DO UNTO YOU' and highlighted similar principles in JUDAISM, ISLAM, HINDUISM AND SIKHISM.
'They each and all reflect a sense that WE SHARE THE PAIN OF OTHERS, and a sense that we believe in something bigger than ourselves - that WE CANNOT BE TRULY CONTENT WHILE OTHERS FACE DESPAIR, CANNOT BE COMPLETELY AT EASE WHILE OTHERS LIVE IN FEAR, CANNOT BE SATISFIED WHILE OTHERS ARE IN SORROW,' he said."
The brute hypocrisy of the man is breathtaking.
"Responsibility from all," says The Dear Leader.
Without a hint of irony.
Does that include your banker pals, Gordon?
Elsewhere in his speech (unquoted by The Mail) he states:
"Instead of a global free market threatening to descend into a global free for all, we must reshape our global economic system so that it respects the values we celebrate in our everyday lives."
Firstly, Gordon, would you mind telling me why it took you twelve, long years to figure out that a grubby bunch of trough-guzzlers weren't going guzzle when you stuck the trough right under their piggie snouts?
I mean, they got to hog the trough in the Thatcher years, didn't they? Were you not watching what they were doing back then? I mean, for goodness sake, when you were in opposition you were always up in arms about sleaze! How come everything changed as soon as you got into power? Did you think that greedy financiers would, all of a sudden, not behave like greedy financiers because it was you and St Tony who were trusting them not to do so?
And as for the "global free market THREATENING to descend into a global free for all", it isn't threatening, Gordon, the threatening was done years ago. The free market was "threatening to descend" when Thatcher and her monetarist chums got started. By the time you took over, the "global free for all" was in full swing and, hey, let's be honest for once, you didn't just let it carry right on swinging, did you?
You gave it an extra push!
Gordon continues:
"I believe that both markets and governments have a responsibility to serve the public interest, that the poor are our shared responsibility and that wealth carries unique responsibilities too."
If this is what you really believe, Gordon, how come you have served "the public interest" so very badly up to now?
I mean you and your obscenely avaricious banker pals have just saddled us with two lifetime's worth of debt. How can that possibly be in the interest of the public? And this when we've just paying off the Yanks for the deeply disgusting "lend-lease" debts of WWII!
Oh, and how come you've waited this long to remind the wealthy of their "unique responsibilities" to the rest of us? Shouldn't you have been reminding them of that all along? And this “fairness to all” thing. You and Tony Blair haven't been all that fair to the indigenous Brit, now have you, Gordon? I mean, you both kept on importing immigrants into the country when you knew for a fact that we didn’t want any more piling in on top of us. And then, once they got here, you gave them 90 percent of our jobs! And, just in case your immigrant-partial behaviours upset us, you upped the race-law ante such that now, if we give vent to any righteous anti-alien anger, we face the prospect of spending seven long years behind bars!
If any of this was "fair", matey, I'm an old woman's bunion.
And, hey, wasn't it you who you robbed the pension funds almost as soon as you got into power? The pension funds that decent, hard-working and thrifty people set such store by? And now many of those once healthy funds are worth next to nothing or they don't exist any more. And then you sold all that gold at the bottom of the market!
I mean, Gordon, what is it, precisely, that you did that was so wonderful?
And as for being fair to the English, well, you and your Scots-Irish predecessor both employed Scots out of all proportion to their incidence in the population in your Cabinets and Ministries, now didn't you? That wasn't very fair now was it? Why did you do that? How on earth do you imagine you can get away with calling yourself fair when you both chauvinistically promoted Scots up the greasy pole and, thus, prevented the appropriate number of Anglos from progressing?
The majority tribe have, as a result of your sectarian bias, been governed, largely, by the non-English for a very long time now. Can you show me where it says that such a carry-on is fair in your big book of "fair to all" fables?
You are not a fair man, Gordon.
You are a foul man. You’re a psychopathic Anglophobe who has spent all of his time at the top of the tree sucking up to a rich and powerful elite and ignoring those the Labour Party was formed to represent.
What did you do with our industry? You kept on disappearing it, like your best pal, Thatcher. What did you do with the hospitals and our childrens’ education? You did your best to privatise the one whilst you politicised and dumbed-down the other.
How many have died of C-diff and all the other bugs on your watch, Gordon? How many have died because your imported doctors and nurses didn’t do their jobs properly? Who put the wants and needs and attitudes of foreign children before those we elected you to nurture and educate? Why are so many of our kids feral now? Who turned them to drink, drugged them up and indebted them massively if they decided to push on to university?
My God, "fair to all"? Massively over-fair to your immigrant, your wallet-stuffing banker and parliamentary pals and monstrously unfair to those you were elected to serve.
That's how it seems to me.
"Do to others what you would have them do unto you."
I beg your pardon? Does that mean we get to screw you like you screwed us? No thanks, Gordon. That might be something that might interest you and your gay pals in parliament but such things have rarely been on the menu down our way.
"We share the pain of others."
Yeah, you inflict it and we suffer it.
Such sharing we can do without, my son.
"We cannot be truly content while others face despair, cannot be completely at ease while others live in fear, cannot be satisfied while others are in sorrow."
Gordon, you are one sick, New World Order teaboy! You and Tony Blair gloried in sticking it to the less well off and morally decent native inhabitants of this country for more than twelve, terrible years. Can you possibly imagine that, somehow, we didn’t notice?
You are hated, mate.
Hated!
If you, and the great traitor that preceded you, don’t die at the end of a rope I will go forth from here an unhappy man. I pray to all the Gods of those whose behinds you sniffed so obsequiously in St Pauls that those you treated so foully in the beast years of Blair and Brown are revenged, to the maximum, upon you both!
Gordon Brown said what he said on the 31st of March.
I wonder why the globalist joker didn't wait until the day after?
On 2 April 2009, at the G20 summit, Gordon Brown told us all that "a new world order is emerging".
He's taken to boldness, has our Gordon, in respect of this particular Nationalist bogey phrase. He's used it quite a few times recently. Not as often as "globalisation" and "global" mind you but enough to let us all know that the NWO elite don't think much of our rag-taggle army of bitter no-hopers. Perhaps he's a believer in Goebbels maxim that, if you tell a big lie often enough, we ordinary folk will, eventually, come to believe it.
What Gordon and his pals will certainly be aware of is this: despite outnumbering THEM by tens of millions to one, THEY have ninety nine percent of the power. And THEY can, therefore, afford to take the p*** out of the rest of us whenever THEY wish.
You keep on looking at your Brave New, broken World out of that dull, sightless eye of yours, Gordon. Seeing only what you want to see, never noticing the things that come out of the dark on the blind side.
That's the way a no-hoper likes it.
"Gordon Brown has made an overtly religious call for a NEW WORLD ORDER based on the 'deep moral sense' shared by all faiths. Making the first speech by a serving Prime Minister at St Paul's Cathedral in London, he quoted scripture as he urged people to unite to forge a new 'GLOBAL SOCIETY'.
The Prime Minister argued that through all faiths, traditions and heritages runs a 'single powerful modern sense demanding RESPONSIBILITY FROM ALL AND FAIRNESS TO ALL'.
He quoted the Christian doctrine of 'DO TO OTHERS WHAT YOU WOULD HAVE THEM DO UNTO YOU' and highlighted similar principles in JUDAISM, ISLAM, HINDUISM AND SIKHISM.
'They each and all reflect a sense that WE SHARE THE PAIN OF OTHERS, and a sense that we believe in something bigger than ourselves - that WE CANNOT BE TRULY CONTENT WHILE OTHERS FACE DESPAIR, CANNOT BE COMPLETELY AT EASE WHILE OTHERS LIVE IN FEAR, CANNOT BE SATISFIED WHILE OTHERS ARE IN SORROW,' he said."
The brute hypocrisy of the man is breathtaking.
"Responsibility from all," says The Dear Leader.
Without a hint of irony.
Does that include your banker pals, Gordon?
Elsewhere in his speech (unquoted by The Mail) he states:
"Instead of a global free market threatening to descend into a global free for all, we must reshape our global economic system so that it respects the values we celebrate in our everyday lives."
Firstly, Gordon, would you mind telling me why it took you twelve, long years to figure out that a grubby bunch of trough-guzzlers weren't going guzzle when you stuck the trough right under their piggie snouts?
I mean, they got to hog the trough in the Thatcher years, didn't they? Were you not watching what they were doing back then? I mean, for goodness sake, when you were in opposition you were always up in arms about sleaze! How come everything changed as soon as you got into power? Did you think that greedy financiers would, all of a sudden, not behave like greedy financiers because it was you and St Tony who were trusting them not to do so?
And as for the "global free market THREATENING to descend into a global free for all", it isn't threatening, Gordon, the threatening was done years ago. The free market was "threatening to descend" when Thatcher and her monetarist chums got started. By the time you took over, the "global free for all" was in full swing and, hey, let's be honest for once, you didn't just let it carry right on swinging, did you?
You gave it an extra push!
Gordon continues:
"I believe that both markets and governments have a responsibility to serve the public interest, that the poor are our shared responsibility and that wealth carries unique responsibilities too."
If this is what you really believe, Gordon, how come you have served "the public interest" so very badly up to now?
I mean you and your obscenely avaricious banker pals have just saddled us with two lifetime's worth of debt. How can that possibly be in the interest of the public? And this when we've just paying off the Yanks for the deeply disgusting "lend-lease" debts of WWII!
Oh, and how come you've waited this long to remind the wealthy of their "unique responsibilities" to the rest of us? Shouldn't you have been reminding them of that all along? And this “fairness to all” thing. You and Tony Blair haven't been all that fair to the indigenous Brit, now have you, Gordon? I mean, you both kept on importing immigrants into the country when you knew for a fact that we didn’t want any more piling in on top of us. And then, once they got here, you gave them 90 percent of our jobs! And, just in case your immigrant-partial behaviours upset us, you upped the race-law ante such that now, if we give vent to any righteous anti-alien anger, we face the prospect of spending seven long years behind bars!
If any of this was "fair", matey, I'm an old woman's bunion.
And, hey, wasn't it you who you robbed the pension funds almost as soon as you got into power? The pension funds that decent, hard-working and thrifty people set such store by? And now many of those once healthy funds are worth next to nothing or they don't exist any more. And then you sold all that gold at the bottom of the market!
I mean, Gordon, what is it, precisely, that you did that was so wonderful?
And as for being fair to the English, well, you and your Scots-Irish predecessor both employed Scots out of all proportion to their incidence in the population in your Cabinets and Ministries, now didn't you? That wasn't very fair now was it? Why did you do that? How on earth do you imagine you can get away with calling yourself fair when you both chauvinistically promoted Scots up the greasy pole and, thus, prevented the appropriate number of Anglos from progressing?
The majority tribe have, as a result of your sectarian bias, been governed, largely, by the non-English for a very long time now. Can you show me where it says that such a carry-on is fair in your big book of "fair to all" fables?
You are not a fair man, Gordon.
You are a foul man. You’re a psychopathic Anglophobe who has spent all of his time at the top of the tree sucking up to a rich and powerful elite and ignoring those the Labour Party was formed to represent.
What did you do with our industry? You kept on disappearing it, like your best pal, Thatcher. What did you do with the hospitals and our childrens’ education? You did your best to privatise the one whilst you politicised and dumbed-down the other.
How many have died of C-diff and all the other bugs on your watch, Gordon? How many have died because your imported doctors and nurses didn’t do their jobs properly? Who put the wants and needs and attitudes of foreign children before those we elected you to nurture and educate? Why are so many of our kids feral now? Who turned them to drink, drugged them up and indebted them massively if they decided to push on to university?
My God, "fair to all"? Massively over-fair to your immigrant, your wallet-stuffing banker and parliamentary pals and monstrously unfair to those you were elected to serve.
That's how it seems to me.
"Do to others what you would have them do unto you."
I beg your pardon? Does that mean we get to screw you like you screwed us? No thanks, Gordon. That might be something that might interest you and your gay pals in parliament but such things have rarely been on the menu down our way.
"We share the pain of others."
Yeah, you inflict it and we suffer it.
Such sharing we can do without, my son.
"We cannot be truly content while others face despair, cannot be completely at ease while others live in fear, cannot be satisfied while others are in sorrow."
Gordon, you are one sick, New World Order teaboy! You and Tony Blair gloried in sticking it to the less well off and morally decent native inhabitants of this country for more than twelve, terrible years. Can you possibly imagine that, somehow, we didn’t notice?
You are hated, mate.
Hated!
If you, and the great traitor that preceded you, don’t die at the end of a rope I will go forth from here an unhappy man. I pray to all the Gods of those whose behinds you sniffed so obsequiously in St Pauls that those you treated so foully in the beast years of Blair and Brown are revenged, to the maximum, upon you both!
Gordon Brown said what he said on the 31st of March.
I wonder why the globalist joker didn't wait until the day after?
On 2 April 2009, at the G20 summit, Gordon Brown told us all that "a new world order is emerging".
He's taken to boldness, has our Gordon, in respect of this particular Nationalist bogey phrase. He's used it quite a few times recently. Not as often as "globalisation" and "global" mind you but enough to let us all know that the NWO elite don't think much of our rag-taggle army of bitter no-hopers. Perhaps he's a believer in Goebbels maxim that, if you tell a big lie often enough, we ordinary folk will, eventually, come to believe it.
What Gordon and his pals will certainly be aware of is this: despite outnumbering THEM by tens of millions to one, THEY have ninety nine percent of the power. And THEY can, therefore, afford to take the p*** out of the rest of us whenever THEY wish.
You keep on looking at your Brave New, broken World out of that dull, sightless eye of yours, Gordon. Seeing only what you want to see, never noticing the things that come out of the dark on the blind side.
That's the way a no-hoper likes it.
Vote the B*ggers Out!
On 23 March 2009, The Daily Star reported thus:
“BRITAIN IS SITTING ON AN IMMIGRATION TIMEBOMB AS EXPERTS PREDICT UP TO 500 FOREIGN NATIONALS WILL POUR INTO THE COUNTRY EVERY DAY. THEY WARN MILLIONS WILL FLOCK HERE TO MAKE THIS EUROPE’S MOST POPULATED COUNTRY, as environmental problems ravage their own lands.
According to new United Nations figures, MORE THAN 174,000 MIGRANTS WILL COME TO THE UK EVERY YEAR.
THAT IS ALMOST 500 NEW PEOPLE EVERY DAY, AND WILL SEND THE POPULATION SOARING TO 72MILLION BY 2050.
THE MASSIVE INFLUX WILL DEVASTATE OUR TRANSPORT, ENERGY AND HOUSING SYSTEMS, experts have warned.”
Did you vote for this?
You don’t have to have what the PC Crowd in parliament want, you know.All you have to do is to vote the b*ggers out.That's all you have to do if you want your country back.Just vote them out of office.
On 24 March 2009, The Daily Telegraph reported thus:
“A CENTURY OF IMMIGRATION HAS SEEN THE NATION'S DICTIONARY OF NAMES DRASTICALLY ALTERED TO INCLUDE A HOST OF FOREIGN ONES, the study said.
It found that WITHIN THE LAST 100 YEARS, THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE NAMED AHMED, SINGH AND ALI, HAS INCREASED BY MORE THAN 1,000 PER CENT EACH.
THE NAME ZHANG WAS FOUND TO BE THE FASTEST GROWING NAME, HAVING RISEN BY 4,718 PER CENT IN POPULARITY IN JUST 13 YEARS.
PEOPLE NAMED SINGH AND PATEL WERE ALSO FOUND TO BE AT A RECORD HIGH, WITH 95,203 AND 53,295 OF THEM RESPECTIVELY CURRENTLY LIVING IN BRITAIN.
AN INFLUX OF SURNAMES FROM THE ASIAN SUBCONTINENT, CHINA, AND SOUTHERN AFRICA – SUCH AS ASLAM, KIM, XU, NDLOVU AND NCUBE – WAS ALSO NOTED by the researchers.
The study was carried out partly by Experian, the credit agency, which used its database to find out which names were found most frequently in different parts of the country.”
Who voted to import the Asian hordes into our country?
I didn’t.
Who voted to give them more rights than us once they got here?
I didn’t.
Who voted to give them our council houses as soon as they arrived?
I didn’t.
Who voted to whack us with all the made up bogey words (racist, fascist, Nazi, bigot) if ever we complained?
I didn’t.
Who voted to criminalise us with all the anti-British, pro-immigrant race laws if ever we complained too articulately and too often?
Who will keep on voting for our treacherous, Brit-loathing politicians until we are all gone?
Some will, you can be sure of that.
I won’t.
You can be sure of that as well.
On 25 March 2009, The Daily Mirror reported thus:
“AN AL-QAEDA DIRTY BOMB ATROCITY COULD BE IMMINENT, Jacqui Smith said yesterday. The Home Secretary's stark warning came as she outlined the Government's updated anti-terror strategy, Contest Two.
The report said THE RISK OF A CHEMICAL, BIOLOGICAL, RADIOLOGICAL, NUCLEAR OR EXPLOSIVE ATTACK ON THE UK HAS SOARED IN THE PAST FIVE YEARS.
Asked if there was a greater risk of a dirty bomb strike, Ms Smith replied:
‘THERE IS THE POTENTIAL, GIVEN THE INTERNATIONAL SITUATION, WHAT WE BELIEVE TO BE THE ASPIRATIONS OF TERRORISTS, THAT IT COULD BE.’
The report noted the threat to the UK came from four main sources: al-Qaeda; groups affiliated with al-Qaeda; self-starting groups; and terrorist groups following a similar ideology to al-Qaeda.
It said:
‘TERRORIST ORGANISATIONS WILL HAVE ACCESS TO NEW TECHNOLOGY AND MAY BECOME CAPABLE OF CONDUCTING MORE LETHAL OPERATIONS.’
But Ms Smith told MPs the main threat came from al-Qaeda supporters on the Pakistan-Afghan border. She said:
‘WE KNOW THE THREAT IS SEVERE. WE KNOW AN ATTACK IS HIGHLY LIKELY AND COULD HAPPEN, WITHOUT WARNING, AT ANY TIME’.”
Who brought the “terrorists” here?
I didn’t.
Who voted to give the "terrorists" more rights than us once they got here?
I didn’t.
Who voted to give the "terrorists" our council houses as soon as they arrived?
I didn’t.
Who voted to whack us with all the made up bogey words ("racist", "fascist", "Nazi", "bigot") if ever we complained about the "terrorists"?
I didn’t.
Who voted to criminalise us with all the anti-British, pro-immigrant race laws if ever we complained about the "terrorists" too articulately and too often?
I didn’t.
Did you vote for “an Al-Qaeda dirty bomb atrocity” in Britain?
I didn’t.
But that is what the Jacqui Smiths, the Tony Blairs, the Gordon Browns and the rest of the bought politicians have landed us with, isn’t it?
Why did they never do what we, who voted for them, wanted?
Why did they always ignore what we said?
Because they’re politicians, I guess.
And politicians lie.
That’s how they get voted into power.
That’s why we vote for them.
Time, after time, after time, enough of us choose to believe their lies because it suits us to do so.
And so we are where we are now. Stuck fast in the melting pot with all the Ahmeds, Singhs, Alis, Zhangs, Patels, Aslams, Kims, Xus, Ndlovus, Ncubes and dirty bombs.
As the wise man once said:
“If you always do what you always did, you’ll always get what you always got”.
Next time you vote, you should try to remember what the wise man said.
And vote the b*ggers out.
On 23 July 2005, just 16 days after four Muslims murdered 52 people in the London bombings, The Daily Telegraph told us that:
“ONE IN FOUR MUSLIMS SYMPATHISES WITH MOTIVES OF TERRORISTS”.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1494648/One-in-four-Muslims-sympathises-with-motives-of-terrorists.html
Extrapolated to the entire Muslim population of the UK, this means that more than 400,000 of them “sympathises with motives of terrorists”.
According to the YouGov survey upon which this estimate was based, six percent, or 100,000, of the Muslims resident in this country “think the bombings in London on July 7 were justified” and thirteen percent (216,666) had “a lot” of sympathy for the bombers.These findings, of course, only express what those questioned were prepared to admit to.
The YouGov survey can be found here:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/8067153/YouGov-British-Muslim-Online-Survey
According to the 1901 census, there were 14 Ahmeds; 53 Alis; 32 Patels; 60 Singhs and no Zhangs at all living in Britain.
If you want your country back, ladies and gentlemen, you're going to have stop voting for those who stole it.
It's as simple as that.
“BRITAIN IS SITTING ON AN IMMIGRATION TIMEBOMB AS EXPERTS PREDICT UP TO 500 FOREIGN NATIONALS WILL POUR INTO THE COUNTRY EVERY DAY. THEY WARN MILLIONS WILL FLOCK HERE TO MAKE THIS EUROPE’S MOST POPULATED COUNTRY, as environmental problems ravage their own lands.
According to new United Nations figures, MORE THAN 174,000 MIGRANTS WILL COME TO THE UK EVERY YEAR.
THAT IS ALMOST 500 NEW PEOPLE EVERY DAY, AND WILL SEND THE POPULATION SOARING TO 72MILLION BY 2050.
THE MASSIVE INFLUX WILL DEVASTATE OUR TRANSPORT, ENERGY AND HOUSING SYSTEMS, experts have warned.”
Did you vote for this?
You don’t have to have what the PC Crowd in parliament want, you know.All you have to do is to vote the b*ggers out.That's all you have to do if you want your country back.Just vote them out of office.
On 24 March 2009, The Daily Telegraph reported thus:
“A CENTURY OF IMMIGRATION HAS SEEN THE NATION'S DICTIONARY OF NAMES DRASTICALLY ALTERED TO INCLUDE A HOST OF FOREIGN ONES, the study said.
It found that WITHIN THE LAST 100 YEARS, THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE NAMED AHMED, SINGH AND ALI, HAS INCREASED BY MORE THAN 1,000 PER CENT EACH.
THE NAME ZHANG WAS FOUND TO BE THE FASTEST GROWING NAME, HAVING RISEN BY 4,718 PER CENT IN POPULARITY IN JUST 13 YEARS.
PEOPLE NAMED SINGH AND PATEL WERE ALSO FOUND TO BE AT A RECORD HIGH, WITH 95,203 AND 53,295 OF THEM RESPECTIVELY CURRENTLY LIVING IN BRITAIN.
AN INFLUX OF SURNAMES FROM THE ASIAN SUBCONTINENT, CHINA, AND SOUTHERN AFRICA – SUCH AS ASLAM, KIM, XU, NDLOVU AND NCUBE – WAS ALSO NOTED by the researchers.
The study was carried out partly by Experian, the credit agency, which used its database to find out which names were found most frequently in different parts of the country.”
Who voted to import the Asian hordes into our country?
I didn’t.
Who voted to give them more rights than us once they got here?
I didn’t.
Who voted to give them our council houses as soon as they arrived?
I didn’t.
Who voted to whack us with all the made up bogey words (racist, fascist, Nazi, bigot) if ever we complained?
I didn’t.
Who voted to criminalise us with all the anti-British, pro-immigrant race laws if ever we complained too articulately and too often?
Who will keep on voting for our treacherous, Brit-loathing politicians until we are all gone?
Some will, you can be sure of that.
I won’t.
You can be sure of that as well.
On 25 March 2009, The Daily Mirror reported thus:
“AN AL-QAEDA DIRTY BOMB ATROCITY COULD BE IMMINENT, Jacqui Smith said yesterday. The Home Secretary's stark warning came as she outlined the Government's updated anti-terror strategy, Contest Two.
The report said THE RISK OF A CHEMICAL, BIOLOGICAL, RADIOLOGICAL, NUCLEAR OR EXPLOSIVE ATTACK ON THE UK HAS SOARED IN THE PAST FIVE YEARS.
Asked if there was a greater risk of a dirty bomb strike, Ms Smith replied:
‘THERE IS THE POTENTIAL, GIVEN THE INTERNATIONAL SITUATION, WHAT WE BELIEVE TO BE THE ASPIRATIONS OF TERRORISTS, THAT IT COULD BE.’
The report noted the threat to the UK came from four main sources: al-Qaeda; groups affiliated with al-Qaeda; self-starting groups; and terrorist groups following a similar ideology to al-Qaeda.
It said:
‘TERRORIST ORGANISATIONS WILL HAVE ACCESS TO NEW TECHNOLOGY AND MAY BECOME CAPABLE OF CONDUCTING MORE LETHAL OPERATIONS.’
But Ms Smith told MPs the main threat came from al-Qaeda supporters on the Pakistan-Afghan border. She said:
‘WE KNOW THE THREAT IS SEVERE. WE KNOW AN ATTACK IS HIGHLY LIKELY AND COULD HAPPEN, WITHOUT WARNING, AT ANY TIME’.”
Who brought the “terrorists” here?
I didn’t.
Who voted to give the "terrorists" more rights than us once they got here?
I didn’t.
Who voted to give the "terrorists" our council houses as soon as they arrived?
I didn’t.
Who voted to whack us with all the made up bogey words ("racist", "fascist", "Nazi", "bigot") if ever we complained about the "terrorists"?
I didn’t.
Who voted to criminalise us with all the anti-British, pro-immigrant race laws if ever we complained about the "terrorists" too articulately and too often?
I didn’t.
Did you vote for “an Al-Qaeda dirty bomb atrocity” in Britain?
I didn’t.
But that is what the Jacqui Smiths, the Tony Blairs, the Gordon Browns and the rest of the bought politicians have landed us with, isn’t it?
Why did they never do what we, who voted for them, wanted?
Why did they always ignore what we said?
Because they’re politicians, I guess.
And politicians lie.
That’s how they get voted into power.
That’s why we vote for them.
Time, after time, after time, enough of us choose to believe their lies because it suits us to do so.
And so we are where we are now. Stuck fast in the melting pot with all the Ahmeds, Singhs, Alis, Zhangs, Patels, Aslams, Kims, Xus, Ndlovus, Ncubes and dirty bombs.
As the wise man once said:
“If you always do what you always did, you’ll always get what you always got”.
Next time you vote, you should try to remember what the wise man said.
And vote the b*ggers out.
On 23 July 2005, just 16 days after four Muslims murdered 52 people in the London bombings, The Daily Telegraph told us that:
“ONE IN FOUR MUSLIMS SYMPATHISES WITH MOTIVES OF TERRORISTS”.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1494648/One-in-four-Muslims-sympathises-with-motives-of-terrorists.html
Extrapolated to the entire Muslim population of the UK, this means that more than 400,000 of them “sympathises with motives of terrorists”.
According to the YouGov survey upon which this estimate was based, six percent, or 100,000, of the Muslims resident in this country “think the bombings in London on July 7 were justified” and thirteen percent (216,666) had “a lot” of sympathy for the bombers.These findings, of course, only express what those questioned were prepared to admit to.
The YouGov survey can be found here:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/8067153/YouGov-British-Muslim-Online-Survey
According to the 1901 census, there were 14 Ahmeds; 53 Alis; 32 Patels; 60 Singhs and no Zhangs at all living in Britain.
If you want your country back, ladies and gentlemen, you're going to have stop voting for those who stole it.
It's as simple as that.
That's it. I'm 21 and I'm Dead!
On 3 April 2009, The Daily Mail reported thus:
“A ROMANIAN CAREER CRIMINAL WHO RAPED A YOUNG WOMAN SO HE COULD BE SENT TO A 'LUXURIOUS' BRITISH PRISON and get free lodgings and English lessons had his wish granted yesterday. Ali Majlat, who was allowed into this country DESPITE HAVING SPENT MORE THAN HALF HIS LIFE IN PRISON, cornered a 21-year-old at a deserted train station and attacked her in a subway.
HE HAD BEEN RELEASED FROM PRISON IN OXFORDSHIRE ONLY TWO DAYS EARLIER, travelling to Yorkshire in an unsuccessful attempt to visit his brother Dominic, WHO WAS ALREADY IN JAIL FOR RAPE. Majlat, 35, had been inspired to carry out his crime after hearing from Dominic about THE 'EASY AND COMFORTABLE CONDITIONS' IN BRITISH JAILS, and yesterday he was ordered to serve an indeterminate sentence at one...
'This was a woman who was deliberately raped so that he could get accommodation in prison,' said Judge Alistair McCallum at Leeds Crown Court. 'IT DOESN'T GET MUCH WORSE’… Branding HIM 'ABSOLUTELY WORTHLESS TO OUR COMMUNITY', the judge said Majlat could be considered for parole in four-and-a-half years' time but is likely to be imprisoned at huge expense to the taxpayer for many years longer…
Majlat grew up in one of his home country's notorious Communist-era state orphanages because HIS ILLITERATE PARENTS COULD NOT AFFORD TO FEED HIM. After leaving the institution at the age of 16 he was soon caught stealing, and ended up spending 19 YEARS IN ROMANIAN PRISONS WITH A TOTAL OF 11 CONVICTIONS FOR THEFT AND BURGLARY.
Last August, with HIS 45-YEAR-OLD BROTHER SERVING A LIFE SENTENCE HERE FOR RAPE AND ATTEMPTED MURDER, he travelled to Britain to visit him. Before he had the chance to do so, HE WAS CONVICTED IN CONNECTION WITH A BURGLARY in London and jailed for eight weeks.
DESPITE HIS RECORD, HE WAS NOT DEPORTED on his release on October 10 because he was not deemed to be 'high risk'. Instead he travelled to Wakefield, West Yorkshire, two days later to visit his brother, but was turned away because he did not have the right paperwork.
Majlat went straight to Wakefield Kirkgate station where he spotted the young woman, a soldier's girlfriend, on a deserted platform. After pestering her, saying 'You should love me' in broken English, HE BEGAN PUNCHING AND KICKING HER. She fled down an underpass, but Majlat caught up with, pinned her to the ground, HALF-STRANGLED HER AND RAPED HER.
She later told police the thought that flashed through her mind:
'THAT'S IT, I'M 21 AND I'M DEAD.'
However, Majlat released her after taking her mobile phone and money. He travelled to London where he was caught after using the mobile. He later told a psychologist:
'When I was on the railway station I thought I SHOULD RAPE THIS LADY IN ORDER TO GET A PLACE TO EAT AND SLEEP AND LEARN THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE’…
Yesterday officials who had dealt with Majlat in Romania revealed that IF THEY HAD BEEN ASKED, THEY WOULD HAVE CLASSIFIED HIM ' HIGH RISK' AND CAPABLE OF RAPE. They were not surprised that he committed crime just to get into a British jail, saying he was completely institutionalised after spending his life in a grim orphanage followed by prison.
'HE ALWAYS FELT BETTER IN PRISON, it was the only support system he ever received,' said the chief psychologist at Bircea Mare Prison...
In Majlat's hometown of Petrila, head of social services Susana Heljiu said:
'HE WAS ONE OF FIVE CHILDREN PLACED INTO AN ORPHANAGE BY HIS MOTHER. IT WAS EASIER FOR HER TO HAND THEM OVER TO THE STATE THAN PROVIDE FOOD AND A HOME HERSELF’.
An acquaintance said:
'His attitude was simple - if he got away with the crime, he benefited. IF HE GOT CAUGHT, HE WOULD GO TO PRISON, AND THAT'S WHAT HE REALLY WANTED’…
AS WITH OTHER EU CITIZENS, ROMANIAN NATIONALS NEED ONLY A PASSPORT TO ENTER BRITAIN, so immigration staff may not be given details of any convictions in their home countries...
HIS VICTIM HAS BEEN LEFT SERIOUSLY TRAUMATISED BY HER ORDEAL, has difficulty sleeping and is afraid of men and isolated locations...
Majlat appeared to smirk in the dock due to what his lawyer said was a medical condition.”
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1167122/Romanian-raped-woman-live-luxury-British-jail-gets-wish.html
Dominic Majlat was given two life sentences for rape and GBH with intent.
After tricking a woman into his car with a promise of tickets to a London Mardi Gras festival, he hit her in the face with a wooden stave, knocking out three of her teeth, raped her and then attempted to strangle her.
Passing sentence upon him, the Judge said:
"She was a woman who had not had sexual intercourse with a man before. She only managed to escape by jumping through a window and was left with multiple injuries.”
He is an illegal immigrant who raped, clubbed and attempted to strangle “a woman who had not had sexual intercourse with a man before” in England’s capital city. He already had two convictions for rape in his home country before he did what he did in London. And his brother punched and kicked a young woman before half-strangling and raping her, in order, not just to slake his animal lusts, but to take advantage of the cushy number Dominic Majlat was already experiencing.
Don’t you think it would be a good idea to try and keep such people out of our country?
Our politicians don’t. They have been aiding and abetting the Majlats ever since they foist the first race law upon us 44 years ago. In what way, ladies and gentlemen, did our parliamentary overlords, those who know so much better and see so much further than us, ever expect us to profit from the importation of such corrupt, ignorant and brutish foreigners? In what way was the vast majority ever going to be “enriched” by such predictable horror? How were we ever going to benefit from such “absolutely worthless” creatures as these?
The answer is simple. The powers-that-be knew this would happen and they could not have cared less. Those we voted for to protect and promote our interests always knew what the probable outcome of such a rapid and massive colonisation of our land would be. Those who would dare to say they didn’t forsee this should have resigned long ago. Their consciences should have told them that they had had failed in their duty to the British people and were unfit to serve them. However, you may have noticed that the current crop of parliamentarians do not seem the least bit encumbered by conscience. They appear to be much more interested in stuffing their already bulging wallets full of our tenners than they are in representing our interests.
In truth, folks, they are at war with us.
They are at war with us because they are either wholly self-obsessed and motivated, and would never lift a finger to help those who elected them, or because they belong to a sinister confederacy of elite criminals who have, over the last sixty years, sought to destroy our world.
If you find this last statement difficult to believe, read through the Daily Mail article once again and then multiply the Majlats by ten thousand. And then consider that our politicians have created an enormous body of law and entitlement specifically designed to persuade and encourage such people to come here and to ease the way for them once they arrive.
For example, for almost fifty years now, a Majlat would have found it much easier to gain access to council housing than a Brit in straightened circumstances. Now you tell me, does a government that would DELIBERATELY set about creating such a desperate state of affairs really have the best interests of the native people of these islands at heart?
Laws were in place forty years ago that gave the Thought Police of the time the power to come down hard on an employer who was rather too concerned to see that an unsuitable alien did not get the job. And as for the angry Brit who might be tempted tell a Majlat to b*gger off home, well, he’s been sorted since 1965 when the Home Secretary of the time, Frank Soskice, led the way in imposing the first race law upon us.
Perhaps those of you who are a little too ready to dismiss the at-war-with-us hypothesis out of hand might have a little think about this: Frank Soskice was a Russian immigrant whose father was the Private Secretary of the Russian Revolutionary leader, Alexander Kerensky.
Why did Harold Wilson choose a man with such dubious origins to argue the toss, as Home Secretary, for the first British race law? Well, perhaps the answer may be found in the unlikeliest of places.
Ken Livingstone said this in the House of Commons on 10 Jan 1996:
“In 1961, Anatoli Golitsin, a KGB defector… told MI5 that he had heard of a KGB plot to kill the leader of a west European political party so that its man could take over… Peter Wright and other extreme right-wingers inside MI5… believed that the assassinated party leader had to be Gaitskell…
MI5 believed that seven members of Wilson's Government and three other Labour Members of Parliament were either spies or at the very least security risks… Will Owen, the Member of Parliament for Morpeth, eventually turned out to be guilty… All the other names on MI5's list were completely innocent, but that did not stop MI5, in particular Peter Wright, hounding Bernard Floud... MI5 pursued him until he finally committed suicide in a moment of despair.
The other seven Members on MI5's list were John Diamond, Tom Driberg, Judith Hart, Stephen Swingler, John Stonehouse, Barnet Stross and, OF COURSE, WILSON…In the summer of 1967, people from MI5 met people from the CIA, the FBI and the Australian and New Zealand security services in Melbourne, Australia, where they were addressed by Golitsin about his Wilson allegations.
Matters began to hot up when the press baron Cecil King, a long-standing MI5 agent, began to discuss the need for a coup against the Wilson Government… At a meeting with Lord Mountbatten and the Government's chief scientific adviser, Solly Zuckerman, he urged Mountbatten to become the leader of a Government of national salvation…Zuckerman pointed out that that was treason, and left the meeting. The idea came to nothing because of Mountbatten's reluctance to act.”
As regards Livingstone’s assertion that Bernard Floud was “completely innocent”, in his book, Their Trade is Treachery, the author Chapman Pincher alleged that he had been presented by MI5 with evidence that he had worked for the KGB and this was confirmed by Peter Wright, the MI5 officer who interrogated him, in Spycatcher.
On 10 January 1965, Frank Soskice eulogised the outsider thus:
“THE NEW ARRIVALS ARE HARMLESS, FRIENDLY PEOPLE”.
In October 2008, 43 years and 10 months after the “harmless, friendly people” were given more rights in Britain than the British themselves, a young Englishwoman was moved to say, “that's it, I'm 21 and I'm dead”, as she was being strangled and raped by a "new arrival" who just happened to have spent 19 years in a series of Romanian prisons. Six months later, a learned Judge opined that “it doesn't get much worse” than the “harmless, friendly” incident perpetrated by Ali Majlat.
Without in any way wishing to make light of the horrific suffering an innocent, young girl endured at the hands of an alien beast, I’d have to say that the undeclared war our own politicians have been waging upon us for the last half century would take some beating. It is because of them that obscenities like Ali and Dominic Majlat are now able to wreak their savagery, so easily, upon the British people.
“A ROMANIAN CAREER CRIMINAL WHO RAPED A YOUNG WOMAN SO HE COULD BE SENT TO A 'LUXURIOUS' BRITISH PRISON and get free lodgings and English lessons had his wish granted yesterday. Ali Majlat, who was allowed into this country DESPITE HAVING SPENT MORE THAN HALF HIS LIFE IN PRISON, cornered a 21-year-old at a deserted train station and attacked her in a subway.
HE HAD BEEN RELEASED FROM PRISON IN OXFORDSHIRE ONLY TWO DAYS EARLIER, travelling to Yorkshire in an unsuccessful attempt to visit his brother Dominic, WHO WAS ALREADY IN JAIL FOR RAPE. Majlat, 35, had been inspired to carry out his crime after hearing from Dominic about THE 'EASY AND COMFORTABLE CONDITIONS' IN BRITISH JAILS, and yesterday he was ordered to serve an indeterminate sentence at one...
'This was a woman who was deliberately raped so that he could get accommodation in prison,' said Judge Alistair McCallum at Leeds Crown Court. 'IT DOESN'T GET MUCH WORSE’… Branding HIM 'ABSOLUTELY WORTHLESS TO OUR COMMUNITY', the judge said Majlat could be considered for parole in four-and-a-half years' time but is likely to be imprisoned at huge expense to the taxpayer for many years longer…
Majlat grew up in one of his home country's notorious Communist-era state orphanages because HIS ILLITERATE PARENTS COULD NOT AFFORD TO FEED HIM. After leaving the institution at the age of 16 he was soon caught stealing, and ended up spending 19 YEARS IN ROMANIAN PRISONS WITH A TOTAL OF 11 CONVICTIONS FOR THEFT AND BURGLARY.
Last August, with HIS 45-YEAR-OLD BROTHER SERVING A LIFE SENTENCE HERE FOR RAPE AND ATTEMPTED MURDER, he travelled to Britain to visit him. Before he had the chance to do so, HE WAS CONVICTED IN CONNECTION WITH A BURGLARY in London and jailed for eight weeks.
DESPITE HIS RECORD, HE WAS NOT DEPORTED on his release on October 10 because he was not deemed to be 'high risk'. Instead he travelled to Wakefield, West Yorkshire, two days later to visit his brother, but was turned away because he did not have the right paperwork.
Majlat went straight to Wakefield Kirkgate station where he spotted the young woman, a soldier's girlfriend, on a deserted platform. After pestering her, saying 'You should love me' in broken English, HE BEGAN PUNCHING AND KICKING HER. She fled down an underpass, but Majlat caught up with, pinned her to the ground, HALF-STRANGLED HER AND RAPED HER.
She later told police the thought that flashed through her mind:
'THAT'S IT, I'M 21 AND I'M DEAD.'
However, Majlat released her after taking her mobile phone and money. He travelled to London where he was caught after using the mobile. He later told a psychologist:
'When I was on the railway station I thought I SHOULD RAPE THIS LADY IN ORDER TO GET A PLACE TO EAT AND SLEEP AND LEARN THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE’…
Yesterday officials who had dealt with Majlat in Romania revealed that IF THEY HAD BEEN ASKED, THEY WOULD HAVE CLASSIFIED HIM ' HIGH RISK' AND CAPABLE OF RAPE. They were not surprised that he committed crime just to get into a British jail, saying he was completely institutionalised after spending his life in a grim orphanage followed by prison.
'HE ALWAYS FELT BETTER IN PRISON, it was the only support system he ever received,' said the chief psychologist at Bircea Mare Prison...
In Majlat's hometown of Petrila, head of social services Susana Heljiu said:
'HE WAS ONE OF FIVE CHILDREN PLACED INTO AN ORPHANAGE BY HIS MOTHER. IT WAS EASIER FOR HER TO HAND THEM OVER TO THE STATE THAN PROVIDE FOOD AND A HOME HERSELF’.
An acquaintance said:
'His attitude was simple - if he got away with the crime, he benefited. IF HE GOT CAUGHT, HE WOULD GO TO PRISON, AND THAT'S WHAT HE REALLY WANTED’…
AS WITH OTHER EU CITIZENS, ROMANIAN NATIONALS NEED ONLY A PASSPORT TO ENTER BRITAIN, so immigration staff may not be given details of any convictions in their home countries...
HIS VICTIM HAS BEEN LEFT SERIOUSLY TRAUMATISED BY HER ORDEAL, has difficulty sleeping and is afraid of men and isolated locations...
Majlat appeared to smirk in the dock due to what his lawyer said was a medical condition.”
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1167122/Romanian-raped-woman-live-luxury-British-jail-gets-wish.html
Dominic Majlat was given two life sentences for rape and GBH with intent.
After tricking a woman into his car with a promise of tickets to a London Mardi Gras festival, he hit her in the face with a wooden stave, knocking out three of her teeth, raped her and then attempted to strangle her.
Passing sentence upon him, the Judge said:
"She was a woman who had not had sexual intercourse with a man before. She only managed to escape by jumping through a window and was left with multiple injuries.”
He is an illegal immigrant who raped, clubbed and attempted to strangle “a woman who had not had sexual intercourse with a man before” in England’s capital city. He already had two convictions for rape in his home country before he did what he did in London. And his brother punched and kicked a young woman before half-strangling and raping her, in order, not just to slake his animal lusts, but to take advantage of the cushy number Dominic Majlat was already experiencing.
Don’t you think it would be a good idea to try and keep such people out of our country?
Our politicians don’t. They have been aiding and abetting the Majlats ever since they foist the first race law upon us 44 years ago. In what way, ladies and gentlemen, did our parliamentary overlords, those who know so much better and see so much further than us, ever expect us to profit from the importation of such corrupt, ignorant and brutish foreigners? In what way was the vast majority ever going to be “enriched” by such predictable horror? How were we ever going to benefit from such “absolutely worthless” creatures as these?
The answer is simple. The powers-that-be knew this would happen and they could not have cared less. Those we voted for to protect and promote our interests always knew what the probable outcome of such a rapid and massive colonisation of our land would be. Those who would dare to say they didn’t forsee this should have resigned long ago. Their consciences should have told them that they had had failed in their duty to the British people and were unfit to serve them. However, you may have noticed that the current crop of parliamentarians do not seem the least bit encumbered by conscience. They appear to be much more interested in stuffing their already bulging wallets full of our tenners than they are in representing our interests.
In truth, folks, they are at war with us.
They are at war with us because they are either wholly self-obsessed and motivated, and would never lift a finger to help those who elected them, or because they belong to a sinister confederacy of elite criminals who have, over the last sixty years, sought to destroy our world.
If you find this last statement difficult to believe, read through the Daily Mail article once again and then multiply the Majlats by ten thousand. And then consider that our politicians have created an enormous body of law and entitlement specifically designed to persuade and encourage such people to come here and to ease the way for them once they arrive.
For example, for almost fifty years now, a Majlat would have found it much easier to gain access to council housing than a Brit in straightened circumstances. Now you tell me, does a government that would DELIBERATELY set about creating such a desperate state of affairs really have the best interests of the native people of these islands at heart?
Laws were in place forty years ago that gave the Thought Police of the time the power to come down hard on an employer who was rather too concerned to see that an unsuitable alien did not get the job. And as for the angry Brit who might be tempted tell a Majlat to b*gger off home, well, he’s been sorted since 1965 when the Home Secretary of the time, Frank Soskice, led the way in imposing the first race law upon us.
Perhaps those of you who are a little too ready to dismiss the at-war-with-us hypothesis out of hand might have a little think about this: Frank Soskice was a Russian immigrant whose father was the Private Secretary of the Russian Revolutionary leader, Alexander Kerensky.
Why did Harold Wilson choose a man with such dubious origins to argue the toss, as Home Secretary, for the first British race law? Well, perhaps the answer may be found in the unlikeliest of places.
Ken Livingstone said this in the House of Commons on 10 Jan 1996:
“In 1961, Anatoli Golitsin, a KGB defector… told MI5 that he had heard of a KGB plot to kill the leader of a west European political party so that its man could take over… Peter Wright and other extreme right-wingers inside MI5… believed that the assassinated party leader had to be Gaitskell…
MI5 believed that seven members of Wilson's Government and three other Labour Members of Parliament were either spies or at the very least security risks… Will Owen, the Member of Parliament for Morpeth, eventually turned out to be guilty… All the other names on MI5's list were completely innocent, but that did not stop MI5, in particular Peter Wright, hounding Bernard Floud... MI5 pursued him until he finally committed suicide in a moment of despair.
The other seven Members on MI5's list were John Diamond, Tom Driberg, Judith Hart, Stephen Swingler, John Stonehouse, Barnet Stross and, OF COURSE, WILSON…In the summer of 1967, people from MI5 met people from the CIA, the FBI and the Australian and New Zealand security services in Melbourne, Australia, where they were addressed by Golitsin about his Wilson allegations.
Matters began to hot up when the press baron Cecil King, a long-standing MI5 agent, began to discuss the need for a coup against the Wilson Government… At a meeting with Lord Mountbatten and the Government's chief scientific adviser, Solly Zuckerman, he urged Mountbatten to become the leader of a Government of national salvation…Zuckerman pointed out that that was treason, and left the meeting. The idea came to nothing because of Mountbatten's reluctance to act.”
As regards Livingstone’s assertion that Bernard Floud was “completely innocent”, in his book, Their Trade is Treachery, the author Chapman Pincher alleged that he had been presented by MI5 with evidence that he had worked for the KGB and this was confirmed by Peter Wright, the MI5 officer who interrogated him, in Spycatcher.
On 10 January 1965, Frank Soskice eulogised the outsider thus:
“THE NEW ARRIVALS ARE HARMLESS, FRIENDLY PEOPLE”.
In October 2008, 43 years and 10 months after the “harmless, friendly people” were given more rights in Britain than the British themselves, a young Englishwoman was moved to say, “that's it, I'm 21 and I'm dead”, as she was being strangled and raped by a "new arrival" who just happened to have spent 19 years in a series of Romanian prisons. Six months later, a learned Judge opined that “it doesn't get much worse” than the “harmless, friendly” incident perpetrated by Ali Majlat.
Without in any way wishing to make light of the horrific suffering an innocent, young girl endured at the hands of an alien beast, I’d have to say that the undeclared war our own politicians have been waging upon us for the last half century would take some beating. It is because of them that obscenities like Ali and Dominic Majlat are now able to wreak their savagery, so easily, upon the British people.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
