On 23 March 2009, The Daily Star reported thus:
“BRITAIN IS SITTING ON AN IMMIGRATION TIMEBOMB AS EXPERTS PREDICT UP TO 500 FOREIGN NATIONALS WILL POUR INTO THE COUNTRY EVERY DAY. THEY WARN MILLIONS WILL FLOCK HERE TO MAKE THIS EUROPE’S MOST POPULATED COUNTRY, as environmental problems ravage their own lands.
According to new United Nations figures, MORE THAN 174,000 MIGRANTS WILL COME TO THE UK EVERY YEAR.
THAT IS ALMOST 500 NEW PEOPLE EVERY DAY, AND WILL SEND THE POPULATION SOARING TO 72MILLION BY 2050.
THE MASSIVE INFLUX WILL DEVASTATE OUR TRANSPORT, ENERGY AND HOUSING SYSTEMS, experts have warned.”
Did you vote for this?
You don’t have to have what the PC Crowd in parliament want, you know.All you have to do is to vote the b*ggers out.That's all you have to do if you want your country back.Just vote them out of office.
On 24 March 2009, The Daily Telegraph reported thus:
“A CENTURY OF IMMIGRATION HAS SEEN THE NATION'S DICTIONARY OF NAMES DRASTICALLY ALTERED TO INCLUDE A HOST OF FOREIGN ONES, the study said.
It found that WITHIN THE LAST 100 YEARS, THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE NAMED AHMED, SINGH AND ALI, HAS INCREASED BY MORE THAN 1,000 PER CENT EACH.
THE NAME ZHANG WAS FOUND TO BE THE FASTEST GROWING NAME, HAVING RISEN BY 4,718 PER CENT IN POPULARITY IN JUST 13 YEARS.
PEOPLE NAMED SINGH AND PATEL WERE ALSO FOUND TO BE AT A RECORD HIGH, WITH 95,203 AND 53,295 OF THEM RESPECTIVELY CURRENTLY LIVING IN BRITAIN.
AN INFLUX OF SURNAMES FROM THE ASIAN SUBCONTINENT, CHINA, AND SOUTHERN AFRICA – SUCH AS ASLAM, KIM, XU, NDLOVU AND NCUBE – WAS ALSO NOTED by the researchers.
The study was carried out partly by Experian, the credit agency, which used its database to find out which names were found most frequently in different parts of the country.”
Who voted to import the Asian hordes into our country?
Who voted to give them more rights than us once they got here?
Who voted to give them our council houses as soon as they arrived?
Who voted to whack us with all the made up bogey words (racist, fascist, Nazi, bigot) if ever we complained?
Who voted to criminalise us with all the anti-British, pro-immigrant race laws if ever we complained too articulately and too often?
Who will keep on voting for our treacherous, Brit-loathing politicians until we are all gone?
Some will, you can be sure of that.
You can be sure of that as well.
On 25 March 2009, The Daily Mirror reported thus:
“AN AL-QAEDA DIRTY BOMB ATROCITY COULD BE IMMINENT, Jacqui Smith said yesterday. The Home Secretary's stark warning came as she outlined the Government's updated anti-terror strategy, Contest Two.
The report said THE RISK OF A CHEMICAL, BIOLOGICAL, RADIOLOGICAL, NUCLEAR OR EXPLOSIVE ATTACK ON THE UK HAS SOARED IN THE PAST FIVE YEARS.
Asked if there was a greater risk of a dirty bomb strike, Ms Smith replied:
‘THERE IS THE POTENTIAL, GIVEN THE INTERNATIONAL SITUATION, WHAT WE BELIEVE TO BE THE ASPIRATIONS OF TERRORISTS, THAT IT COULD BE.’
The report noted the threat to the UK came from four main sources: al-Qaeda; groups affiliated with al-Qaeda; self-starting groups; and terrorist groups following a similar ideology to al-Qaeda.
‘TERRORIST ORGANISATIONS WILL HAVE ACCESS TO NEW TECHNOLOGY AND MAY BECOME CAPABLE OF CONDUCTING MORE LETHAL OPERATIONS.’
But Ms Smith told MPs the main threat came from al-Qaeda supporters on the Pakistan-Afghan border. She said:
‘WE KNOW THE THREAT IS SEVERE. WE KNOW AN ATTACK IS HIGHLY LIKELY AND COULD HAPPEN, WITHOUT WARNING, AT ANY TIME’.”
Who brought the “terrorists” here?
Who voted to give the "terrorists" more rights than us once they got here?
Who voted to give the "terrorists" our council houses as soon as they arrived?
Who voted to whack us with all the made up bogey words ("racist", "fascist", "Nazi", "bigot") if ever we complained about the "terrorists"?
Who voted to criminalise us with all the anti-British, pro-immigrant race laws if ever we complained about the "terrorists" too articulately and too often?
Did you vote for “an Al-Qaeda dirty bomb atrocity” in Britain?
But that is what the Jacqui Smiths, the Tony Blairs, the Gordon Browns and the rest of the bought politicians have landed us with, isn’t it?
Why did they never do what we, who voted for them, wanted?
Why did they always ignore what we said?
Because they’re politicians, I guess.
And politicians lie.
That’s how they get voted into power.
That’s why we vote for them.
Time, after time, after time, enough of us choose to believe their lies because it suits us to do so.
And so we are where we are now. Stuck fast in the melting pot with all the Ahmeds, Singhs, Alis, Zhangs, Patels, Aslams, Kims, Xus, Ndlovus, Ncubes and dirty bombs.
As the wise man once said:
“If you always do what you always did, you’ll always get what you always got”.
Next time you vote, you should try to remember what the wise man said.
And vote the b*ggers out.
On 23 July 2005, just 16 days after four Muslims murdered 52 people in the London bombings, The Daily Telegraph told us that:
“ONE IN FOUR MUSLIMS SYMPATHISES WITH MOTIVES OF TERRORISTS”.
Extrapolated to the entire Muslim population of the UK, this means that more than 400,000 of them “sympathises with motives of terrorists”.
According to the YouGov survey upon which this estimate was based, six percent, or 100,000, of the Muslims resident in this country “think the bombings in London on July 7 were justified” and thirteen percent (216,666) had “a lot” of sympathy for the bombers.These findings, of course, only express what those questioned were prepared to admit to.
The YouGov survey can be found here:
According to the 1901 census, there were 14 Ahmeds; 53 Alis; 32 Patels; 60 Singhs and no Zhangs at all living in Britain.
If you want your country back, ladies and gentlemen, you're going to have stop voting for those who stole it.
It's as simple as that.